Search This Blog


Thursday, December 8, 2016

An interesting look into Common core and the failure of communism

Well also have another article about Kyle Weissman and his misadventures in public school.

BACK BY POPULAR DEMAND: 10 reasons Liberals are worse than Conservatives

I Came across a liberal article today that was steeped in total and utter ignorance "Top ten Reasons why liberals are better than conservatives." HAH! After two years of Obama and the Democrats, you must be blind not to see the fallacy of this statement. Add to this the trashing of our constitutional rights by Democrats for decades.

With this in Mind, I decided to refute it with something of my own. Why Liberals are really WORSE than Conservatives. BTW, this guy claims to be centrist. He certainly is not.

10) Liberals prefer to be sensitive to the issues of various groups of people, while conservatives deride sensitivity as “political correctness.” (“Macaca,” anyone?)

Political correctness is in reality cultural Marxism. Its used by liberals to silence opposing views about certain aberrations found in cultures groups and ideas. An example is Militant Islam. It is illegal in Liberal Europe to criticize Islam because that is hate speech. Ironically it is not illegal for Muslims to advocate killing non Muslims.

9) Conservatives prefer cutting taxes on the wealthy even if it creates deficits. Liberals believe in paying for what you spend.

Liberals like Obama in the mean time just spend spend spend spend. Real conservative cut taxes AND spending.

8)Conservatives prefer to thumb their noses at the rest of the world. Liberals remember that America is the leader of a community of nations.

Pointing out how the values and beliefs of other nations create more problems as opposed to the judeo Christian morals we were founded on is not thumbing our noses. Europeans have been attacking us since our founding in order to discredit our constitutional and Christian philosophies as opposed to their views of absolutionism.

7) Conservatives prefer to shoot first and ask questions later. Liberals prefer to ponder the long-term consequences of their actions before using force..

Liberals never considered the consequences of gun control, speech codes, high taxes and regulations then and despite the fact they failed still wont consider it.

6) Conservatism cares most about what is best for the individual, and is therefore inherently a selfish philosophy. Liberalism cares most about what’s best for society and the environment as a whole.

In other words, it is selfish to allow John Q Taxpayer to have the right to decide how to run his business and his household and keep what he has earned but not selfish for society to grab away his money property and what he owns, boss him around in running his business and as a result cause him and his family to become homeless and destitute. Neither is it selfish for 51% to oppress the other 49% for whatever reason even deciding that they no longer have the right to live. This is Socialism. This group mentality of taking away other people's property and redistributing it IS completely selfish and disrespectful.

For a few examples, Zimbabwe Africa and its policy of confiscating land for the greater good, An attempt by liberals to limit personal rights of those who no longer want to live in a blue state for economic reasons And using government programs to confiscate money from society's weakest Individuals who are elderly or disabled. Using SSI among other things.

This is why liberalism creates poverty and fails everywhere. Because rights to own property and rights of the individual are not respected. This By the way is one of the foundations of fascism. Individualism as opposed to collectivism is the opposite of selfishness.

5) Conservatives prefer to prey on the environment for the sake of industry. Liberals understand that without a healthy planet and environment there can BE no industry.

Well there's nothing necessarily wrong with that but the environmentalists tend to put the welfare of weeds bugs and owls over the welfare of human beings and their jobs. A healthy planet is useless if you are starving, unemployed and sick from preventable diseases like malaria.

4) Conservatives want to legislate morality to other people who may not share their views. Liberals prefer to live and let live.

This is totally outrageous. First of all Liberals Never in history want to live and let live. Just look at the examples above to see why. Liberals want the government to decide what's best for us and every time in history that has happened it has failed. Conservatives meanwhile are legislating morality that is sensible and respects the rights of the individual.

3) Conservatives believe that majority rules. Liberals understand that the Bill of Rights was crafted to protect minorities from the predations of majorities.

This is Backwards. Its liberals who want the majority to decide whats best. remember all that talk he just gave us about how individualism is selfish as opposed to collectivism?

2) For conservatives, religion and politics are like bread and butter. For liberals, they are like oil and water.

Real conservatives don't want to merge religion and government but to keep religion completely separate is a bad idea. If there is no supreme being then there is no absolutes and if there are no absolutes then there is no law or morality. This can explain why we have so much crime and corruption.

And the top reason in my mind why conservatism is backwards and Luddite:

1) Conservatives prefer looking to the past for guidance on solving today’s problems. Liberals understand that times change and often require new approaches to problems not envisioned by our forefathers.

Which can be summed with this. Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. But suddenly that is now luddite. the values our founders gave us work. The few changes made to the constitution since were based on the same founding principles. Up until recently when liberals began taking over.

The Author should thank people like us for not going off the cliff like all the other nations like in Europe which as a result of ignoring Judeo Christian principles in favor of socialism suffered from wars, famines, holocausts and tyrannical governments. If not for Conservatives he would be in a sweatshop, in a gas chamber or lined up against the wall facing a firing squad. All I might add "for the good of society" just like he himself preaches.

On top of that he adds something else

I also can’t help but toss in one last one for the sake of humor:

0.5) Have you ever known anyone “hip” who was a conservative?

Ad hominem. Hollywood is controlled by Marxists. celebrities that come out in favor of the values of liberty and freedom like Kirk Cameron, Charlton Heston, Carrie Prejean ETC do so usually at the end of their careers or at their own peril and by doing so brings an end to it. Liberals by their nature are the biggest discriminators in the country. Even hillbilly racists in Jim Crow south were as ill tempered or abhorrent as Hollywood leftists.

So there you have it. Another example of the foolishness and vanity of liberalism.

Wednesday, December 7, 2016

A Jewish and Catholic conservative on the Real O'neals

According to the Catholic league, The Tv Show Real O'neals is crashing.  Praise be to God!

If you want to learn more about it click here for moreinfo 

And now some other observation on this washout of a TV show.

Peter O'shea:

No one watches s*** shows like the O'neals anymore because of the internet. Look, we got amateur producers and cartoonists on Hulu, Newgrounds, YT, Dailymotion ETC who are making higher quality shows that people want to watch. I prefer fantasy and family entertainment. has a lot of good stuff you wont find on TV including some family friendly worth while entertainment. (NOTE: We have a rule, My children cannot access the site without supervision and unless I watch it first because of the filters and because there's too much x-rated referenced material on there.)
The internet gives consumers a choice for what kind of shows they want to watch or they can make their own shows. The corporate networks which pander to low-iq unsophisticated low lives like the schmucks that supported Obama and watch football, Real O'neals and other trite cannot compete so they lobby to regulate the internet and take away our freedom of choice.
The ultimate goal of the corporate networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, ETC) and their owners (Disney, Fox, Westinghouse, GE, Warner Bros. ETC.) is to take away our right to choose and make the internet like TV was back in the 20th century: Limited choices for what to watch on a fixed schedule, TV content that the producers and network owners choose not us, Programs that are more designed to indoctrinate into materialistic secular humanism and the myth that all cultures and religions are morally pure and equal and that people in general are all good and the false paradigms of liberalism, egalitarianism, materialism and socialism.
In short, the producers and Network execs want to indoctrinate us to become hippie socialist atheists more than entertain. That and distract us.
The ultimate goal of SOPA PIPA and CISPA was to do just that. The american people said no but in the end they will try again and will succeed in making some kind of regulation. Either that or the corporations will monopolize the ISPS and block out content we want but wont let us have.
The Real O'neals will get cancelled eventually. I'm looking forward to corn beef and hash this and green beer knowing that Dan Savage and his supporters will lose out again. Then again the networks execes will probably get riled and fight back against the American consumer and their freedom to choose.

Reuben Ben Abraham:The reason that shows like the O'neals are allowed on the networks is because they go unchallenged by the public. The show's advertisers fund the networks and the shows. They target shows with high viewer potential. The O'neals initially had potential in their pilot episode since it was controversial and there was curiosity about the show's content. Now they can expect a gradual decline in viewership especially as people condemn the show and boycott it. Whether or not this show lasts more than one or two seasons is more up to the public and the advertisers than the networks.
It is the advertisers that are key to these shows. Declining viewership equals less advertisement and that means the networks cannot offer a profitable deal on advertisement spaces. At best you'll only get a small amount of money from mostly small commercials that will offer to pay less from smaller business that caters to the remaining audience.
Targeting the advertisers for boycott also makes this effective.
In the 50s this is how the only 3 channels we had were able to stay up. If the public saw a show or episode of a show that they didn't like they would phone the networks and tell them feedback. They wont watch their networks anymore if they continue to put out entertainment that's boring and bland or if the show is immoral and suggestive. Knowing that this will lead to a loss of profit, the networks cancel the show or remove the episode.
Two good examples: One was the untouchables staring Robert Stack as Elliot Ness. People objected terribly to the level of violence on some of the episodes but what really set people off was the portrayal of Italian Immigrants who made up many of the gangs in Chicago. Capone was Italian and so was Frank Nitti his successor. The show was boycotted by groups made up of Italian-Americans. The Longshoreman association, the Brooklyn Waterfront and celebrities like Frank Sinatra (who ironically was rumored to have mob connections and played as mobsters in film and TV) and even the son of Al Capone boycotted the network and the companies that advertised them.
In no time the shows producers changed their tune. No more fictional Italian gangsters more emphasis on Italian-American role in law enforcement such as Ricco Rossi, Elliot's right hand and more positive portrayals of Italians. After this, it was just Frank Nitti who acted as the few Italian antagonists. The show began to go after Gangsters who were either, German, Irish or whatever else. Mostly Germans who probably had more to do with bootlegging and illegal sales of alcohol in prohibition than the Italians did.
The next good example was See it now with Edward R. Murrow. When Murrow went after McCarthy, his real problem was not McCarthy himself but the viewers and advertisers who were anti-communist and pro-McCarthy. The show was advertised by Alcoa which worked with the government in the military-industrial complex and sold farm equipment and building material. These farmers were mostly staunch anti-communists who were slighted by Murrow's opposition to McCarthy. They dropped advertisements and they switched to Kent cigarettes. Unfortunately Murrow overcame and McCarthy was removed from power.
We can do the same thing with the O'neals. Boycott the program and if that doesn't work boycott the advertisers. I don't think it'll take too much effort. This is a show that is going in decline and most of the reviews i've read are not favorable.

Tuesday, December 6, 2016

SSI took away my rights and made me too poor to survive

The following is an email from Mark Nugent of Sacramento california who at the age of 16 was forced into the mental health system against his will, branded mentally ill, stripped of his trust fund by his liberal parents and forced on SSI.

The SSI program was originally intended for those liberals branded too old or too stupid to work. It pays very little, about $695 a month and to receive it one must not hold assets or property worth more than $2000. 

People with disabilities who receive SSI [Supplemental Security Income] payments continue to be the nation’s poorest citizens. The average annual income of a single individual receiving SSI payments was $7,436 far below the federal poverty level. SSI recipient's income is sixty percent less than the federal poverty level SOMETIMES EVEN LESS!!! Since the first Priced Out study was published in 1998, the value of SSI payments compared to median income has declined precipitously – from 24.4% of median income in 1998 to 18.7% in 2010 while national average rents have risen over 50% during the same time period. 

SSI recipients are usually forced on the program against their will by mean liberal relatives and government workers in order to control and manipulate them and steal their assets. Government workers often exploit SSI recipients and subjugate them to humiliation, unnecesary auditing, forced treatment, captivity in group homes or institutions and are often homeless.

The vast majority of SSI recipients are homeless due to low incomes as well as abusive payees. The Representative Payee program manages the majority of SSI funds for victims. The payees are often mean, rude and abusive and steal from the recipients or "beneficiary" as they are labeled. The government often permits this and does nothing about it since they are all lazy bums anyway.

In 2010, as a national average, a person receiving SSI needed to pay 172% of their monthly income to rent a modest one-bedroom unit. In the 12 years since the first Priced Out was published, the amount of monthly SSI income needed to rent a modest one-bedroom unit has increased an astonishing 62 percent. People with disabilities were also priced out of smaller studio/efficiency units, which averaged 99% of monthly SSI. In the end of 2016, those numbers haven't improved.

So it goes with Mark Nugent who wrote to us in response to our many articles cataloging the abuse and failure of our government and the true evil nature of the SSI program and social security, perhaps the only other program other than Obamacare that has failed more than any other grandiose welfare program that Democrats have hashed out since the dictatorship of FDR.

Dear Brian

My name is Mark Nugent, I am 27 years old and live in Portland Oregon. I am originally from The Sacramento area, I used to live in Tulare where I grew up. I was born in Tulare and moved to Sacromento When I was 15. I used to be well liked and have lots of friends in Tulare but when we got to Sacro, that changed. I was picked on a lot. My parents and teachers forced me to go to a psychiatrist.

They told me that I had Asperger's syndrome and that I had Bipolar disorder. I was diagnosed solely because I was picked on because of tbe fights I got into. The psychiatrist and my parents blamed me exclusively for all the problems that happened. My doctor was Dr. Guohua Xia. They made no mention of the problems being recent and that I made many accomplishments and had many friends in Tulare. Dr Xia just told me, "Oh, well do you have friends now? No? Then you obviously are the problem!"

Guohua Xia always had negative things to say to me. When I got picked on, he told me that it was my fault for not socializing and for having anti-social behavior. He never said what that behavior was or why it was my fault he just said it was and he said it was also my fault that the meds he forced me to take made me sleepy and prevented me from studying and getting good grades.

Before being medicated, I got good grades. I was an A, B student then I started getting Ds and Cs. I was forced to take it by the teachers and parents.

I was on six different types of medication of Bipolar and autism. Disorders I really don't have. I was on Seroquel, Zyprexa, Depakote and a few other drugs I don't remember.

Also, my parents always took Xia's side against me. They argued that professionals who are licensed do not make mistakes and know better than minors who are totally nuts. When I brought up that Xia was educated in a medical school in Communist China they laughed at me,.

I was told by Dr. Xia that was unable to work and that I probably wouldn't make it in the real world. He recommended that I be forced on SSI and be placed either in a residential care facility or a boarding care home. I freaked out when I heard it. My parents were delighted with the idea.

I was not allowed to work at a job at summer time or anytime. My parents told me I couldn't handle it "because the doctor said so..." I was devastated. I was also told i couldn't work because they wanted me to be on SSI instead and everyone on SSI can't work.

When I turned 17 I ran away from home and hitchhiked to Denver Colorado. I didn't get very far however. I didn't know my social security number and no one in my family wanted to help me. I was told that I had to go back to California. I spent 6 months in Denver. Nobody could help me since I did not have my social and any money. When it got cold I was compelled to return. By this time I was 18 and was of legal age so they couldn't do to much damage to me then. But that doesn't mean they didn't...

When I got back I was forced back on SSI, I was forced back to Brainefit to see Dr Xia who proceeded to make up the worst imaginable lies about me such as that my being homeless in Denver was not because of abuse but because "I was mentally incompetint and unable to care for myself" and put down that I needed a guardian. He also chided me for my personal beliefs.

Well, I learned my SSA number and before they could file guardianship I ran away again this time to Portland Oregon where Ive been since. I went there because SSI was supplemented and to get away from my dad. also mental health services aren't as powerful as they are in California.

That and the fact that I had no education and a psyche record that would keep me from getting a job. I had learned when I was in Denver that the government shares info and private stuff about people with corporations and that just by seeing a doctor and being on SSI was enough to get me away from any decent job!

To top it off, the meds damaged my liver and my brain. I now suffer from ADD as a result from the different meds. I also have diabetes, poor eyesight from the Zyprexa and premature hairloss and balding. I tried to sue the drug companies but I only got a little bit of money. I was homeless for 3 years in the streets of Portland and Eugene before I got housing. I got my GED and I was able to get a part time job at Safeway but it was seasonal. I can only get seasonal employment and temp jobs like Labor ready or grocery and retail. People are reluctant to hire me since I am on SSI.


 Before moving to this once great nation built on the foundations of capitalism and Judeo Christian faith, Dr. Guohua Xia was born and raised in China and was an active member of the Communist youth league. According to the FBI, Guohua Xia received the Medal of Lenin at the age of 14 for ratting on dissident relatives involved in illegal "subversive activity." Xia was rewarded with a scholarship to Peking University. He chose to study for a career in psychiatry in The Beijing School of medicine located at PU.

FBI files show His post graduate studies and work included working at the notorious labor camps including the notorious Shayang Re-education Through Labor camp in Hubei Providence. Xia's early duties included data collection and interviewing victims and aiding in their "rehabilitation." Among his many victims included participants of the Tianamen square riots.

Guohua Xia desired to live in the united states not to enjoy our freedoms and our prosperity but to destroy it. Under ideological exclusion provision to prevent communists from entering America to promote subversive activity, Xia was originally not permitted to enter. However, thanks to Former President and pervert Bill Clinton the law was weakened to allow Chinese subversives like Xia to enter and create havoc. This at the behest of his Chinese associates.

By the way, had Hillary Clinton been elected even more of these subversives would've been allowed to immigrate along with scores of thousands of Jihadist Muslims.

Guohua Xia studied at  University of Nebraska-Lincoln in Marriage therapy and counseling. He then helped found Brainefit, a psychiatric Clinic located outside Sacramento which in addition to proscribing toxic drugs and forcing people on SSI, specialize in magnetic therapy and accupuncture.

FBI data on Dr Guohua Xia is limited due to the Clinton Administration's interference which terminated monitoring of possible subversives from China and other countries. There are now thousands of communist subversives from Asia and former Soviet Bloc countries residing and working amongst us, many of them creating hapless victims like Mark Nugent. This the result of Bill Clinton's legacy.

Sunday, December 4, 2016

Soundtracks for Va11halla included in our sunday catholic media

Due to popular demand I have decided to throw in the soundtracks to the popular video game Va11 halla. I find it a bit tedious to have a bartender sim on sunday but then again I hope its no big deal. ENJOY!

The Vortex—The One True Faith