Recently I saw two movies that attacked the controversial Wal-mart department store. A PBS documentary called Is Wal-Mart good for America? And Wal-Mart the high cost of low price an independent movie about Wal-mart and the Walton family. I also visited wakeupwalmart.com for more info this article is a refutation on most of the BS that appeared on the two documentaries. First of all we need to ask ourselves why "Wal-Mart is under ferocious attack by the left?" Wal-Mart delivers well on its promise of low prices to Americans. Being a resident of one of the poorest and liberal states in the nation, my family and I bank on Wal-Mart to save money. Many other families including those most down and out also bank on Wal-Mart and many also depend on Wal-Mart for income. Living in the least friendly business economy in the nation, Wal-Mart is a sure bet for some income and employment? Many of Wal-Mart’s employees would otherwise have no job were it not for the giant retail. Many of its employees also have barriers that keep them out of most other jobs. Wal-Mart provides relief from poverty for those most in need so just why is the left in an uproar? There are some legitimate concerns that are being brought up, such as Wal-Mart’s dealings with communist China, the threat to small businesses, forcing employees to work of the clock, purchasing from factories with sweatshop labor ETC. but according to media watchdog times watchhttp://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2008/20080605145300.aspx The New York Slimes rag reveals that the main culprits behind the attack are union bosses. Democrats and their Union allies have for many years tried to crack the retail giant to set up unions but in vain. Many anti-Wal-Mart sites including wake up Wal-Mart are behind the attack on Wal-Mart and are run by union activists. Of course the other reason is to promote Marxism. Wal-Mart is the epitome of the success of the free market capitalist system and Marxist Democrats are whipping up the masses to tear it down at all costs using arguments which as I shall demonstrate are as flawed as the failed system Wal-Mart’s worst enemies want to impose on us...
One of the first arguments used and the most common is that Wal-Mart destroys small businesses and drives down land values whenever it builds in a small community. We've seen in happen in a lot of places. Why is it that whenever Wal-Mart builds a new store Main street USA goes to hell in a hand basket? Most of the problem has very little to do with the retail giant coming to town and more to do with economic policies in the city and state that have a profound effect on small businesses as opposed to a mega conglomerate. A good example of this is found in the city of Skowhegan Maine. In the early nineties, Skowhegan Maine was a struggling paper mill town located in Somerset County. The economy like most small towns in Maine struggled under the tyranny of Democrats. Heavy taxes and regulations had taken their toll. Businesses could barely stay afloat that and the town was recovering from a recent recession. Then it came. Wal-Mart began to open its first department stores in Maine including one in Skowhegan. Wal-Mart had no problem absorbing the cost of liberalism while marketing low prices while appealing to the town’s impoverished underclass. Under communism and a post-recession economy, mom and pop could no longer compete it was not a fair fight. Only a couple months after opening, virtually every store in town went out of business. Wal-Mart then began to suffer and raised the cost of its goods to keep up. This prompted outrage, a boycott and intervention by the city to keep costs down. Since most of Skowhegan’s residents were taking their money elsewhere Wal-Mart brought its prices down.But does this have anything to do with Wal-Mart? Only a little.
You see for over twenty years Maine has been notorious as being the meanest to small business. Maine liberals care more for the welfare of spotted owls rats and birds and trees then family stores and its customers and they care more about lazy irresponsible welfare queens than responsible taxpayers. That is bound to catch up and it has only gotten worse with time. Small businesses on the verge of collapsing were standing on a teetering house of cars. Another tax hike plus the addition of a big retail that could take the beating was all it took. The local paper mill also began laying off workers and many of the residents left. It was not Wal-Mart’s fault that small businesses failed but the fault of Maine's liberal politicians who passed a system of taxation and regulation that pressed hardest on those least able to pay. They simply could not afford the cost.
This brings up another attack, that Wal-Mart jacks the prices up after driving out competition. The Maine economy's effects caught up on big business so Wal-Mart passed that cost on the consumer. A boycott and that people took their money elsewhere encouraged them to bring down the price. It wasn't just Wal-Mart, the local McDonalds restaurant also went under and a local Hannaford’s also almost followed suit. But the town did recover thanks in large to Wal-Mart. After tax revenues began to pour in Skowhegan and other communities were able to set up business incentives to help the little guy compete and ease the burdens. With Wal-Mart other big stores made their way to Maine. Skowhegan now has several mini malls as well as a Best Buy and a Sam's Club. Wal-Mart may as well saved the town of Skowhegan and much of Maine from bankruptcy but that's gratitude for you.
There were some places where Wal-Mart was demanded and welcomed even in Maine! One place was another mill town, Lincoln Maine. (The town is nicknamed stinkin Lincoln because of the paper mill.) In addition to having a mill, the town also boasted large real estate and tourism. Many visitors come to the nearby lake. Many of the customers at Wal-Mart are also tourists. So it's no surprise that many of them have been clamoring for years for a supercenter. Eventually they expanded and are in the process of expanding. By the way, Lincoln and many other communities that have a Wal-Mart store or supercenter (Waterville, Newport, Norway, Lewiston, Augusta, Portland, Saco, Biddeford, Presque Isle, Calais, Houlton, ETC.) still have small businesses. A good friend of mine from Maine now resides in Lubbock Texas told me that the city has at least ten box stores in town. Small business isn't hurt a bit. Part of the Reason is that Texas does not have communist government controls that Maine has. Keep this in mind next time you start hearing a bleeding heart Chicken Little liberal scream about Wal-Mart coming to your town.
Another strong argument is that Wal-Mart mistreats it's workforce by paying its employees very little money or benefits and even encourages its employees to go on welfare programs. Well first of all let's remember that the positions these people are being paid at are entry level positions. When I was growing up before there was a Wal-Mart I worked at a grocery store bagging and stocking and of course I got minimum wage. I was just starting out; I did very menial and simple labor. That's what goes on at Wal-Mart. It's not just them everyone else. But the PC crowd would rather go after Wal-Mart for hiring a single mother of 3 than if they hired a college student at mom and pop's place for peanuts too. That brings us to the people who get hired at these jobs. Some of the people who do get hired at Wal-Mart (Not all of them keep in mine) Some of them are low lifers with no education, with disabilities and who could not get hired at any other jobs because of their incompetence and their record of previous employment. Some of the employees are welfare recipients who are already grandparents at the age of 30 and some of them even have long rap sheets that would keep them out of even most menial jobs but what about the fact that Wal-Mart hires them anyway? What about how Wal-Mart is kind enough to hire those who have no jobs? In an economic wasteland like where I live where people are unable to move because they are too poor, too stupid, or too lazy where do you go to get a job? Leave it to Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart is good for keeping unemployment down. As for wages, many who work either already work another job, some are also on the welfare rolls and are social security recipients so they are already making enough money to get by and support themselves and their families. Also after working for a long period of time, employees make up to 10.17 and hour. Let's ask another question, where are the fathers of these children of single Wal-Mart workers who still cant cut it? They have a litter of children, can't make enough money but we don't ask about where the father(s) of the kids are and why they aren't paying support?Many accuse the retail giant of mistreating its employees by making them work off the clock and not giving them health care benefits.
Others note how overnight employees are locked up and are even threatened with loss of employment if they use the fire exit without manager's permission. Then there are allegations of gender discrimination and Union busting.First concerning working off the clock, Wal-Mart has faced lawsuits throughout the country by employees alleging unpaid labor. Former managers have alleged that workers are not paid working for more than 40 hours a week. In the movie Wal-Mart High cost of Low price, an employee was required to stock several shirts in 30 minutes she had left in her shift but took her an hour. She chooses to say nothing since she feared losing her job. First let me say that this is wrong on many fronts. In America we believe that people should be paid for the work they do. However note that some employees who aren't able to meet that quota needed the extra time. In some businesses such employees are laid off.
Second concerning the controversy over fire exits, this is an outright hoax invented by the anti Wal-Mart crowd. It is true that employees are locked inside after hours but this is to prevent employees from stealing products and to prevent criminals outside from robbing the inside. Other stores and businesses have done the same practice. In the event of a fire federal law requires that employees use the fire exits. No one is going to fire you if you use a fire exit to escape a fire. The place is going to burn to the ground so there goes the job anyway. No use getting cooked yourself. Second no sane businessman would dare allow anything of the sort to happen. If Wal-Mart did so, the ACLU would be licking their chops at an opportunity. Unfortunately not all people are that smart. About twenty years ago in another department store chain, the owners did the same thing and chained the fire exit shut. The place caught on fire and the victims and their families sued the heck out of them. Wal-Mart managers aren't that dumb.
Concerning health care programs, many employees are already covered by local health care programs such as CHIP, Maine care, Medi Cal, Badger care, Medicare, ETC. Unfortunately like other health insurances Wal-Mart health care has been known to be inefficient and restrictive to who gets it. But this problem exists in other companies as well. Still, it is better than no health insurance despite criticism.
Then there’s the big crux, unions. Wal-Mart has been notorious for being anti union but the workers at Wal-Mart are also to blame. Some of them know that many unions are known for being corrupt and extortionist and that rather than make the job easier would make it a nightmare. If unions did succeed, Wal-Mart would be forced to raise it's costs and reduce it's workforce.
One of the biggest lies being brought out is that Wal-Mart fosters racism and gender discrimination. Women according to anti Wal-Mart activists are discriminated on the job in wages and rank because they are woman. Yet in another anti Wal-Mart book called The Working Poor, a middle aged woman on welfare is interviewed complaining she is passed over at Wal-Mart because she is old and over weight. The people who are getting hired to management are younger women. Yes indeed you heard that right! Wal-Mart IS hiring Woman managers. Go to your local Wal-Mart and see for yourself who else is getting into management. The same is said for racism. In Wal-Mart High Cost Low Price, they base this on an interview with a black man who suffered racial bigotry from co workers while management did nothing. Racism exists in other stores and other businesses in America. Again, go to Wal-Mart in urban areas see all the minority managers.
Another lie that is made is that Wal-Mart opposes port security. Several years back it was alleged that Wal-Mart was putting it's profits before America's security to keep importing goods at fast pace. The Wal-Mart lobby demanded that but the truth is there never was any lobbying against tightening port security. Rather the lack of security is a lack of resources at our ports to inspect every ship coming ashore to a do nothing lazy congress that is as lax on port security as border security.One other problem we hear about is empty Wal-Mart stores that take up space and clutter the town. The Empty store is uselessly large and Wal-Mart’s interference to prevent competitors from moving in makes it useless.
This is not quite true. There are a lot of uses for the property. In Lubbock Texas for example, a friend of mine told me that a small shopping mall they have was once an empty Wal-Mart. In Portland Maine, Businesses like Lowe's have moved into empty Wal-Mart’s. The empty stores are often used and reused as shopping malls, mega churches, administration buildings ETC. Also they can just knock it down and build something else in it's place. While they might put a non compete clause in the contract, it has not stopped some stores to be put in good use.
Finally there are the allegations of Wal-Mart importing goods from overseas in sweatshops in places like China India and Mexico ETC. Listen up! Just about every company even small business does this! Still, if you look hard enough there are a few goods at places like Wal-Mart and Target that are sold that have been made in the USA. Just go to any business in America on Main Street and tell me that all mom and pop stores buy American! I’m not saying that's a good thing though but Wal-Mart is not the only guilty party.
Of course there are a few things about Wal-Mart that we should be concerned about. First is that it does receive subsidies from the government and a leg up against everyone else. In Wal-Mart High Cost Low Price, an IGA store went under after a super Wal-Mart opened. The store got 9 million dollars, IGA no money. Wal-Mart should not be getting corporate welfare. It makes companies less efficient, competitive and less innovative. Wal-Mart can still be the best at what it does without help from taxpayers. Second of all, Wal-Mart should do more to use American made goods which are better than the garbage made by third world Marxist slave labor. Third, Wal-Mart stores should hire more workers specifically baggers and they should use this to encourage the welfare recipients in this country to learn work ethics and Wal-Mart should gear their workers toward learning new skills. Fourth, Wal-Mart should do a better job of keeping illegal immigrants out of it's workforce. Several stores in America run by Wal-Mart have been hiring them. I once heard a story how a California Wal-Mart store had mostly immigrants from Mexico and Eastern Europe in it's work force. Most were not documented and sure enough, they were forming a union with the help of their communist allies. It was only then that they took action. They claimed they didn't know they were illegal. (Liars) They fired most of the striking workers and booted the illegal workers and hired the homeless from local shelters as well as welfare recipients to do the work. From what I heard it did the trick. Finally, Wal-Mart should stay out of politics. When they first tried to support gay rights and gay benefits, Wal-Mart lost money and continues to lose money. Best they just stay out of those things.
Despite complaints and criticisms, Wal-Mart INC is far more a boon than a bane for America. Wal-Mart department stores offer cheap solutions to help struggling families save money and stretch their budgets. Although the Walton's themselves may not be charitable (The Waltons have only given 1% of their wealth to charity it is alleged while Bill Gates gave 50% of his wealth) Wal-Mart stores do individually contribute to charities such as United Way, Salvation Army and other groups. They also employ and give hope and a future to those with no job or who cannot find work elsewhere. Working with local welfare agencies, Wal-Mart has successfully brought thousands out of the welfare trap, many of whom were considered unemployable and brought them into the work force. Tax monies from Wal-Mart stores go to funding local programs and helping cities and states in balancing their budget. Wal-Mart IS indeed good for America and at a low cost.
Thursday, January 15, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

11 comments:
Im sorry but I disagree. Walmart and the family are a bunch of marxists. I don't much like Walmart dealing with reds and I especially hate that they use slavery to manufacture their goods.
Your business arguements I must say are top notch. I also like how you debunk false charges that Wally World compromises national security and that they fire employees for using a emergency exit in an emergency.
Great job also bringing up how thes anti walmart nuts re being paid for by labor unions and their Democrat Constituants.
All in all I think it is better than the rest of the articles you've put up this month. Please, stop the reruns and try making more.
I know youre moving but why not get that webmaster history buff of yours to entertain us for awhile?
Well yes walmart does have been too friendly towrds the Chicoms but who isn't? The whole made in he USA label is simply a thing of the past. If its not made in China then its made in India, Pakistan, Mexico or some other 3rd world cesspool.
Labor Unions are also partly to blame. They are just taking and taking and the only way the company can avoid bankruptcy is moving overseas.
And too anonymous if you're reading this? No I do not support enslaving workers, I just think these guys should just take what they get and be happy they aren't makng 50 cents a day instead of driving companies out of business or overseas. Walmart has a good reason to be wary of unions.
Well, labor unions can be trublesome or business. I remember Margret Thatcher and her husband wanted to obilsh them all. I think they need to seriously be regulated. Why not? We regulate business, why not labor?
There were some places where Wal-Mart was demanded and welcomed even in Maine! One place was another mill town, Lincoln Maine. (The town is nicknamed stinkin Lincoln because of the paper mill.) In addition to having a mill, the town also boasted large real estate and tourism. Many visitors come to the nearby lake. Many of the customers at Wal-Mart are also tourists. So it's no surprise that many of them have been clamoring for years for a supercenter.
Yeah, I remember we wanted one in our town too. We were moderately sized then, when it came we really saved big and the funds we recieved really got the town going. I remember the area outside of town was nothing but open land, now we have Walmart and all kinds of stores there as well as a large mall. Mom and Pop stores? Doin' fine.
Wal Mart sucks big time
For once Im agreeing wih a socialist? LOL!
Yup! i know what youre sayin!
People who work at Walmart and other low wage jobs tend to be the kind of people who otherwise wouldn't make it elsewhere.
THe liberals would like Walmart to pay more to these people who either are disabled or are the dregs of society but its just their bleeding heart. But its expensive and not worth it to hire S**tty workers for high wages.
Having been a Walmart shopper for many years not to mention a volunteer at City Homeless shelter I have seen first hand why Walmart is the only job these people can get.
People should be paid for the work they do yes but what if you cant do good work? YOu have people with physical or mental disabilities on one hand who sadly are very challenged and have a difficult time completing certain kinds of tasks depending on the person or the disability whether its physical a mental challenge or mental illness. Thankfully these people get pensions or SSI so the low wages are subsidized
Still you also have people who come from dysfunctional upbringings, who don't care, who have no skills or are criminals or have behaviors that are anti social. These are the kinds of people you do NOT want in management or in certain high paying jobs because of their behavior or demenor.
Walmart and other low wage jobs provide an excellent place for them to learn new skills and hopefully climb the ecnomic ladder.
People on welfare, people who are homeless are generally people who have no skills and are in the situations they are in because of a lack of responsibility. They make for crap workers. So these kinds of people are NOT desired. Walmart OTOH will take a chance with them and help them out. They can afford to take the chance because they are a succesful company and because they pay low wages. Walmart does a service to the community so these people instead of sitting aroundin public housing all day like a lazy old log or going out being criminals or sleeping in doorways or druggin and drinking are working contributing and getting a pay check for doing it.
THe problem with the liberal view that living wages should be givin regardless of how hard someoneworks or how skilled is that you cant afford to train and hire a worker who later on lets you down. Its expensive. Whenever a business hires somebody it takes a risk, It has to pay for that worker to be oriented, trained and you have to have certain people who would otherwise be working on a task go off the taske to teach this person. If he fails and he doesnt meet the standards your gonna lose money. You can just fire him but still you've spent money trying to train this person. The higher the min. wage and the more intrusive the government is the more risky it is to hire someone.
Now add to this this situation: You have an opening and 4 applicans. One is a recent high school graduate with no job experience, the other is a man who hasn't worked in 5 years is on welfare and either lives in a shelter, a motel or public housing then you got a guy who is on Parole who hasn't worked since he got sent to prison 2 years back and who got fired from 6 other jobs in the past 2 months before that happened then you got a woman who 35 is on welfare has 3 kids and never worked before.
All these people are a possible liability. THe high school grad is gonna work for the 1st time. YOu have no idea what kind of person he is. WHat his skills are his traits or behavior and how he's gonna interact withthe other workers and with customers. This is a gamble you're taking. You HAVE to pay him 20$ and hour starting from the moment he goes in for orientation onward. Your company isnt doing so good but you need to fill this position. If these were the only appicants YOu'd hire him and take a chance since these other guys aren't worth it.
The welfare bum who lives in the motel shelter projects whatever isn't worth it. You gotta ask why he hasn't worked in 5 years? Is there a reason? How did he wind up in the rescue mission or the motels? WHy does he need public housing?
HINT: The reason very likely ISNT the economy or whatever.
So chances are if you hire him you're getting a guy who has bats in the belfry, is a drunk maybe an addict and who probably wont even show up. Do you want to pay 20$ and hour to hire this guy?
THe lady on welfare is just the same. Again welfare bums have very bad behaviorn they are poor workers and cant get anything right. I've heard stories about how a lady like this was in her office cleaning toe jam from her toes rather than filing or how these people run their mouths at customers.
THe government offers tax credits for these people but even then its not worth the trouble. THis lady or this guy is trouble. I guarentee it. And you're gonna lose customers and maybe a lot more hiring these kinds of people at a high wage who probably have a path of destruction behind them.
The parolee? Need I say more? YOu want to hire a convict? This guy probably hasn't learned his lesson has come out of prison with behaviors and traits that make you scratch your head and wonder why the hell he got paroled in the first place.
Now if a 5th person walked on in and he had a good resume, job experience, his last job was a couple weeks ago but the business went under and so on. YOu'd hire him instead. Only the high school grad is worth the risk.
Even then you might not get what you bargain for.
But at Walmart they do hire these people because the risk is low because they're free to hire them at low wages at first and fire them if they become trouble.
I know people think its heartless to not hire them at a high wage with more dignity but they need to be thankful. Anyways we have minimum wage, welfare SSI ETC. THese people will get along fine. But they should count their blessings. Walmart is doing everyone a service by giving people who are either disabled retarded, or crippled or challenged as well as the dregs of society, homeless bums druggies alcoholics felons and other crap workers a chance to work and maybe learn a skill.
Post a Comment